TechNewsWorld Talkback

ECT News Community » TechNewsWorld Talkback » hehe... let me explain.

hehe... let me explain.

Posted by DarkProximity on 2004-02-26 05:58:42

In reply to Smithy2004

I'm a computing technician and I test computer software, so I have a different vision. Obviously you noticed two things that appear to be opposite. There's no secure system, as I said, implies that there will always be a form to enter and by definition, Internet was designed to be insecure. If you want maximum security, you just need to disconnect the main computer from the other ones... But if you have a well-configured server, you will not have problems.
-
My fundaments to post that Linux is really more secure than Windows are technical, I don't trust statistics because "statistics are the science that say if you have two cars and I don't have any, then both of us have one car" and "the researches said that 90% of the statistics are false". So, tell me... can you have viruses on Linux? do you have RPC bugs on Linux? In a good Linux setup, you don't have those things. Can I check your Linux box? what version of apache are you running? did you know that apache must run DSO mods in /usr/libexec/apache instead of /usr/libexec?.
-
In Windows, we have some interesting things: Windows 2000 allows a user to run programs which are not installed. For example: (and just an example because I can't remember another one) All the users in a computer lab learned that if you have mIRC 32bit on a disk, you can execute it without installing, so you have an excellent tool for chatting that fits on two diskettes. There are two forms to fix it: One, to deny access to the diskette drive (where will the users save their works?). Two, to deny access from the server. Well... The program still has access to be executed on Windows... for all users. Windows Update always carry problems. I think the only GUI Desktop Environment carrying problems with update is Windows, because they don't use source patches but binary ones. This carry registry problems, security holes, and so... So, can you tell me if "security" exists in Windows? I think it just exists as a word in the Encarta Encyclopedia and in the Micro$oft Office dictionaries
-
I need to leave now... then I'll finish my explanation, ok?


*	Topic	Author	Date
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	Rob Enderle	2004-02-17 21:02:48
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	beaner	2004-02-24 06:19:24
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 08:20:23
	Re: Can Closed-Source Software Survive an Audit? (was Open)	heron	2004-02-22 20:41:15
	Re: Can Closed-Source Software Survive an Audit? (was Open)	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 08:06:47
	Rob undermines his own opinion.	sgt_jake	2004-02-19 12:59:42
	Re: Rob undermines his own opinion.	RobEnderle	2004-02-20 09:55:04
	I call hypocracy	bangular	2004-02-24 05:33:38
	Re: I call hypocracy	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 08:14:22
	Interesting	sgt_jake	2004-04-15 08:14:40
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	jejones3141	2004-02-19 04:04:20
	Re: Can Rob Enderle Survive Reality?	timransom	2004-02-18 20:44:12
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	ptarra	2004-02-18 14:05:38
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	beaner	2004-02-18 13:27:35
	Playing fast and loose with your terms	shadow255	2004-02-18 11:15:07
	Re: Playing fast and loose with your terms	RobEnderle	2004-02-20 09:25:26
	Re: Playing fast and loose with your terms	cricketjeff	2004-02-20 10:01:04
	Re: Playing fast and loose with your terms	RobEnderle	2004-02-20 11:32:51
	Contradictions	JoeBunting	2004-02-24 04:52:15
	Re: Contradictions	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 07:52:36
	Re: Playing fast and loose with your terms	beaner	2004-02-23 07:23:09
	Re: Playing fast and loose with your terms	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 08:27:26
	Re: Playing fast and loose with your terms	cricketjeff	2004-02-20 16:11:42
	Re: Playing fast and loose with your terms	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 08:48:54
	Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	bangular	2004-02-18 13:04:46
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	bangular	2004-02-19 02:47:43
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	cricketjeff	2004-02-20 06:11:08
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	bangular	2004-02-19 17:18:27
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	beaner	2004-02-19 09:12:37
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-20 08:53:30
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	beaner	2004-02-23 08:08:52
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 08:36:20
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	beaner	2004-02-23 08:00:28
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 09:42:54
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	beaner	2004-02-27 07:01:32
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	cricketjeff	2004-02-20 10:07:40
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-20 11:47:05
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	cricketjeff	2004-02-20 14:34:19
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-20 17:07:52
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	bangular	2004-02-23 14:00:50
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 09:54:11
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	bangular	2004-02-24 10:40:08
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 11:14:21
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	bangular	2004-02-24 13:27:47
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 14:10:10
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	cricketjeff	2004-02-21 06:39:38
	Re: Troll your boat, troll your boat, gently down the streeeeam	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 09:00:57
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	jmpnop	2004-02-18 10:19:40
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	RobEnderle	2004-02-20 07:52:51
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	pasikoistinen	2004-02-26 01:46:13
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	ixnayrox	2004-02-17 21:08:56
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	RobEnderle	2004-02-20 10:30:36
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	beaner	2004-02-23 07:51:47
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 14:33:19
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	phfcpa	2004-02-21 07:19:36
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 09:15:42
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	alfarom	2004-02-24 05:45:42
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 09:27:45
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	alfarom	2004-02-24 13:47:46
	Re: Can Open-Source Software Survive an Audit?	RobEnderle	2004-02-24 15:00:56
	Personally, you're wrong...	DarkProximity	2004-02-25 09:46:24
	Re: Personally, you're wrong...	Smithy2004	2004-02-25 13:23:05
	sorry, I had to leave	DarkProximity	2004-02-26 10:21:45
	hehe... let me explain.	DarkProximity	2004-02-26 05:58:42