OpManager: A single console to manage your complete IT infrastructure. Click here for a 30-day free trial.
Welcome | Sign In
TechNewsWorld.com
Discussion

TechNewsWorld Talkback

 
ECT News Community   »   TechNewsWorld Talkback   »   Do I need eight cores? No



Re: AMD Breaks New Ground With FX Bulldozer Processors
Posted by: Richard Adhikari 2011-10-14 14:35:04
See Full Story

Advanced Micro Devices has unveiled its FX Series family of processors, which includes two it heralds as the first eight-core desktop CPUs. These are the first processors available in retail that use AMD's new Bulldozer multicore architecture. The FX processors are priced at between $115 and $245 and are aimed at "enabling the ultimate multimedia experience for digital enthusiasts," AMD spokesperson Miriam Cox told TechNewsWorld. In addition to faster gaming, they will enable media encoding and system performance with high clock speeds and overclocking capabilities.


Do I need eight cores? No
Posted by: jescott418 2011-10-14 14:40:07 In reply to: Richard Adhikari
OK if I was a server 8 cores would be a advantage. In a desktop or laptop eight cores is about 4 cores too many. When I run test and look at CPU usage you are hard pressed to max out 4 cores in general multi tasking and running multiple programs and threads.
You can do it under tests but its really not real world. AMD has simply over played the importance of multi core CPU's from a desktop point of view. Servers on the other hand could certainly benefit from more cores. Super computers could also. Data crunchers as I call them can benefit. The consumer should not be convinced more is better in cores.
Jump to:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ RSS
Cloud-Aware Network Management
Read real-time case studies
EdgeCast Networks