By Katherine Noyes E-Commerce Times Part of the ECT News Network
07/19/07 2:07 PM PT
A House subcommittee will hold a closed hearing to evaluate Google's proposed $3.1 billion acquisition of DoubleClick. Concerns about the deal "have focused not only on the implications for competition -- in online advertising and other possibly affected markets -- but also on the potentially enormous impact on consumer privacy," said Rep. Bobby Rush of Illinois, chairman of the subcommittee.
How Much is 'Free' Costing You? Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.
After months of controversy and global outcry, Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) proposed US$3.1 billion acquisition of DoubleClick (Nasdaq: DCLK) will undergo congressional scrutiny later this year in a planned closed hearing before the House of Representatives' Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection Subcommittee.
Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.), chairman of the subcommittee, on Tuesday announced his intention to hold the hearing in a letter to Federal Trade Commission Chairman Deborah Majoras. Rush also requested a briefing on the FTC's investigation of the proposed merger, which was launched in May.
'Widespread Concern'
"There is widespread concern about the proposed merger between Google and DoubleClick that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) currently is reviewing," Rush wrote.
"Concerns have focused not only on the implications for competition -- in online advertising and other possibly affected markets -- but also on the potentially enormous impact on consumer privacy," he added. "I share these concerns and am writing to notify you that the Subcommittee is considering holding a hearing when an appropriate date becomes available after the August District Work Period."
Google officials could not be reached for comment. Shares in the company fell $3.96 to $549.50 in Wednesday trading.
Industry peers charge that the proposed acquisition would give Google too much control over the online advertising market.
"We continue to believe that Google's acquisition of DoubleClick raises a number of questions about the impact it will have on advertisers, publishers and consumers and believe it warrants closer scrutiny," a Microsoft spokesperson said Thursday.
Indeed, such is the level of concern that one company -- consultancy Precursor -- on Tuesday even launched a virtual press conference to explicate those concerns, predicting optimistically that the FTC would ultimately block the merger.
Privacy fears, meanwhile, center on the notion that Google and DoubleClick, after they are combined, would have access to an unprecedented amount of data on consumers' Web and Internet search habits.
'Bad Deal for Consumers'
"I think it's important that Congress examine the online marketplace," Jeffrey Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, told the E-Commerce Times.
"At the end of the day, the merger must be rejected on competitive and privacy grounds," Chester added. "If Google is allowed to swallow up DoubleClick, what will be merged ultimately is a vast array of consumer information. It's a bad deal for consumers."
Google's announcement of the planned DoubleClick takeover also sparked a flurry of other industry acquisitions, including Yahoo's (Nasdaq: YHOO) purchase of syndication firm Right Media and Microsoft's snatching up of online advertising firm aQuantive.
New Markets, New Rules
Merger mania is a phenomenon that has affected many industries over many years, and antitrust issues are a common concern. "The difference here is that these are emerging markets," Yankee Group analyst Laura DiDio told the E-Commerce Times.
"How do you say someone has a monopoly when the market is not yet fully formed?" DiDio noted. "The question then becomes, what is the intent?"
Fifteen to 20 years ago, when computer security and privacy threats started becoming more evident, there were few laws in place to guide policing and prosecution, DiDio noted. "Now we're out of the infancy of the information age and have moved into the precocious teenage years," she added. "Things are more mature, but we're still left with the dilemma of how to regulate all this.
"What is too much, and what is not enough? What is reasonable to really protect Internet users' privacy, consumers and corporations?" she asked.
The merger is likely to make it through the congressional hearing, DiDio concluded, "but I hope tough questions are asked," she said. "We're still finding our way, and there's got to be a middle ground."
E-Discovery and the SMB July 19, 2007
Most large organizations have responded the recent e-discovery requirements by implementing specific procedures and processes designed to ensure that the right personnel -- both from internal counsel and IT -- are brought to the table early to make sure that artifacts of this type are preserved appropriately. However, SMBs have unique challenges that large firms don't have.
Related Stories
FTC Places Google, DoubleClick Deal Under Magnifying Glass May 29, 2007
The FTC is reportedly investigating the potential antitrust and consumer privacy issues of Google's proposed acquisition of DoubleClick deal. The commission's move follows by a few days a similar step by European Commission regulators, who have asked for more details about the merger's privacy implications.
Privacy Advocates Cry Foul Over Google, DoubleClick Deal April 20, 2007
With Google poised to buy online ad service provider DoubleClick, proponents of Web privacy are concerned that such a merger will put too much user information in one company's hands. Three privacy advocate groups have filed a complaint with the FTC asking the commission to demand that Google make formal guarantees it will not retain certain user info.
Related News Alerts
More by Katherine Noyes
FOSS and the Google Question November 19, 2009
How FOSSy is Google, really? "I find it kinda funny that folks tout that Google uses Linux when the most useful tool they have developed -- the Google FS -- they keep internally and therefore don't have to share the code!" observed Slashdot blogger hairyfeet. "So how exactly is Google different from MSFT and Apple, who have both in the past locked up free code for themselves?"
Can T-Mobile Get Its Groove Back? November 18, 2009
T-Mobile may have a hard time pulling itself out of a swamp of customer discontent if it doesn't reverse course soon. The wireless carrier has been having some bad luck that has only been compounded by some poor decisions. "It takes a long time and much effort to build customer confidence, but a very short time to lose it," remarked telecom analyst Jeff Kagan.
Microsoft Goof - One Small Snag in a Code-Licensing Quagmire November 17, 2009
Microsoft will open source the code to a Windows 7 tool in order to rectify the erroneous inclusion of code licensed under the GPL. Redmond's response to the problem "does indicate a growing maturity with respect to free and open source licenses," said RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady.