By Sonia Arrison TechNewsWorld
03/10/06 5:00 AM PT
Government experts often get things wrong. This makes it incredibly important to leave the market as unfettered by government regulations as possible so as not to create distortions that unintentionally harm consumers.
Tech Industry Paper - Finding Strength Through Customer Service Poised to capitalize on an upturn in the economy, technology companies are focused on retention & service. This paper, from Convergys, provides the latest research on customer experience for B2B & B2C technology customers. Learn more.
The recent news that AT&T (NYSE: T) made a deal to acquire BellSouth (NYSE: BLS) has elicited two reactions: one, an assumption that communications prices will go up; and the other, an assumption that prices will go down. It's always tough to predict exactly what will happen in the marketplace, but the best money will be on the bet that the merger is good for consumers.
The communications market isn't what it used to be, and that's a good thing. Consumers used to get their phone services from the phone company and their cable services from the cable company. With the advent of the digital age and the creation of technologies that allow for multiple types of data to be transmitted using Internet protocols, the market for phone and cable services is open to anyone who can best serve consumers.
Scale Matters
For instance, voice over Internet protocol companies (VoIP) such as Vonage and Skype offer consumers low-cost phone service, making old landlines virtually obsolete. Likewise, new technologies like Internet protocol TV (IPTV) allow for lower-cost video services via the Net.
The nation's telephone and cable companies are well aware of these facts, which is why they have been steadily moving into the broadband market. However, building big data networks is not cheap, which is why there's been so much consolidation in the last couple of years. Even Reed Hundt, former FCC chairman and a Democrat, agrees.
"In this business, scale really matters. It's like NFL linemen. You want 'em big, you want 'em fast, but most important, you want 'em big," Hundt said recently. This apparent reversal of opinion by Hundt was noted by Adam Thierer, analyst for the Progress and Freedom Foundation. Writing for the Technology Liberation blog, Thierer noted that just ten years ago, Hundt considered an AT&T/BellSouth merger unthinkable, yet today he is practically promoting it.
"I have to give Hundt credit for recognizing the changed competitive landscape since 1997," Thierer said. "Long-distance has largely been cannibalized by the rise of rigorous wireless competition and flat-rate nationwide calling plans. The Internet is everywhere, which means IP-enabled calling is a new threat to the old players. And the old Bell copper empire has now become a copper cage they are fighting their way out of."
Experts Can Be Wrong
Indeed -- and it is here that policy makers should note a key lesson -- government experts, like the former FCC chairman, often get things wrong. This makes it incredibly important to leave the market as unfettered by government regulations as possible so as not to create distortions that unintentionally harm consumers.
Hundt, who presided over the implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, might also look back at those regulations to see how government control of the pipes through price controls and forced contracts stymied innovation and harmed consumers. That's a mistake that should be avoided this time around, especially considering the recent Congressional debates over net neutrality -- the idea that no Web sites should be blocked by Internet service providers.
That's a principle that everyone seems to agree with, but the debate gets tricky when content companies like Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) insist that they also shouldn't have to pay more when their services use more bandwidth than other businesses. In making this argument, Google has been looking to government for intervention, but that would be the wrong way to go.
Learning From the Past
It is clear that predictions for communications prices are closely linked with government decisions. If Congress ever decides to put limits on what broadband providers can charge their customers, investment will flee the sector like a vampire from garlic. Given how expensive it is to build the networks, that wouldn't be a good outcome for the companies or consumers, so one hopes that lessons from the past aren't ignored.
The AT&T/BellSouth deal is a natural development in a competitive marketplace that requires large investments to produce effective networks. The highly competitive atmosphere that is driving the merger will also benefit consumers through better prices and quality of service, so long as government works to remove old regulatory barriers and avoids new ones.
Sonia Arrison, a TechNewsWorld columnist, is director of Technology Studies at the California-based Pacific Research Institute.
IT Security Issues Pose Major Risk for E-Healthcare March 09, 2006
There is increasing concern that e-health records, when linked to any computer network, can be as vulnerable as PCs are to attack from Internet predators. Shouldn't the industry devise security measures that can protect that kind of sensitive data, before doctors start making it readily available over shared databases and networks?
Related Stories
Don't Tax the Internet March 03, 2006
America is already ranked a lowly 16th in broadband deployment, and moves to saddle the medium with old and dysfunctional programs will only make it worse. That's not telecom reform, only a sneaky move at new taxes and regulation.
Longer Lives Threatened by Global Divide Arguments February 24, 2006
Just because the rich were the first to get indoor plumbing, radio, telephone, television and the Internet does not mean that these technologies do not eventually make their way to the rest of the population.
Reform Video Franchising Now February 17, 2006
New technologies that allow for high-speed data transfer over the Internet have revolutionized the way consumers and businesses communicate, shaking up the nation's communications sector from telecommunications to cable. Laws that used to make sense have now become obstacles to positive change and consumer benefit.
Fighting Spam Also Requires Fighting Knee-Jerk Critics February 10, 2006
This is not, as some portray it, an introduction of economics into the e-mail system. Economics are already in place, facilitating spam and costing people time and money. E-stamps represent a quest for better economics, and those who believe they create free speech problems or violate some special spirit of the 'Net need to re-examine their arguments.
Fatal Conceit at the California Public Utilities Commission February 03, 2006
It's a mistake that policy makers have been making for ages and one aptly described by Friedrich Hayek as the "fatal conceit" -- the notion that a few very informed people could order societal affairs in ways that would somehow yield results superior to those that spring from the spontaneous order of a free society. This can lead to all sorts of problems.
Related News Alerts
More by Sonia Arrison
How to Solve the Net Neutrality Issue October 28, 2009
Regulation by the U.S. government is not the way to keep the Internet neutral. A better approach would be self-regulation. Now is the time for ISPs to support an independent, private body to monitor neutrality issues and forestall the possibility of the FCC "managing competition" on the Internet.
FCC's Genachowski Not Neutral on New Net Rules September 30, 2009
The proponents of Net neutrality say it's necessary for a free and open Internet, but history doesn't support that argument. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, for example, was supposed to bolster competition. Instead, by compelling companies to share their infrastructures, it reduced incentives for improvement. In the long run, it failed.
What Has President Obama Done for Silicon Valley? August 28, 2009
President Obama's appointments of Silicon Valley outsiders were only the first indications that his administration would be less than friendly to the high-tech industry, despite campaign promises. Since then, it has shown an inclination toward tight regulatory practices and away from transparency.