Welcome | Sign In
TechNewsWorld.com
Social Networking

Marines Cut Off From Social Networks

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
Marines Cut Off From Social Networks

The Department of Defense will conduct an overall review of the security implications of allowing members of the military to interact with social networks. In the meantime, rules are inconsistent. Marines have been banned from using military networks to access the sites, while the Army gets to tweet at will.


Time to upgrade your existing phone system?
Which solution will best suit your business? This free 4-part guide will help you evaluate whether your current phone system is suitable for your needs and how it may impact future growth. Learn more.

The U.S. Marine Corps has banned service members from using military computers to access social networking sites, and the Department of Defense is reviewing the services to see if they pose too great a security threat to allow.

Such sites are popular with young service members who want to keep in touch with friends and family at home, but the Marine Corps' chief information officer, Brig. Gen. George J. Allen, said in a memo issuing the ban Tuesday that such sites create "a larger attack and exploitation window" and increase the risk that service members will share information that should be kept under wraps.

The order, which expires in one year unless renewed or supplanted by other guidance, involves all social networking sites, including Facebook, MySpace and Twitter. It carves out room for exceptions to the policy based on operational needs, but calls for an extensive review process before such authorization would be granted. The policy does not ban Marines from using the services on personal computers.

The DoD review will address the security risks of social networking sites, as well as the value they provide in helping the agency communicate, according to statements posted to the agency's Web site. A new policy could be approved by October.

Loose Lips

Keeping troops from spilling sensitive information has been a problem commanders have dealt with throughout military history. It is exacerbated today by ready access to Web services that can spread information globally in minutes.

However, banning a select group of popular social networking sites from military networks isn't likely to do much to improve security, said Michael Sutton, vice president of security research at Zscaler, a cloud-based network security company.

"Banning three social networking sites is going to have a negligible impact on network security," Sutton told TechNewsWorld, "and in the end, you're throwing the baby out with the bath water."

For one thing, service members could still post sensitive information using personal computers or smartphones, Sutton noted. The ban also interferes with the ability of service members to communicate with loved ones, especially while deployed and in combat.

What's needed, in his view, is a policy of managing and monitoring site access to prevent uploads of sensitive information and to monitor what's downloaded to prevent problems.

Use in Public Relations

Social networking sites are attractive not only to service members, but also to high-ranking officers. Public relations machines for the Department of Defense and the various services are increasingly integrating social networking into their publicity and outreach efforts.

In fact, Price Floyd, the Pentagon's recently appointed principal deputy assistant secretary of public affairs,, has spoken of the need to increase the military's social networking presence to communicate with young service members, as well as young people abroad, to help inform and shape their perceptions of the U.S. and military operations.

On Tuesday, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, posted a message to his Twitter account suggesting he would be loath to let go of a tool that enables him to easily and quickly communicate with the public and service members.

"Obviously, we need to find the right balance between security and transparency," he wrote. "We are working on that. But am I still going to tweet? You bet."


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Mike Pearson


More by Mike Pearson

Google Shows Off a Chrome Tablet With 1,000 Faces
February 02, 2010
With the tech world caught in the grip of iPad-mania, Google wants to pull a little focus to its own tablet plans. It has released some concept art depicting what a tablet based on the Chrome operating system might look like and what it might possibly be capable of doing. It could be more attractive than an iPad in some ways. Of course, it could also be a no-show, as nothing official is out of the bag yet.
Could an 'iPad' Make E-Readers Irrelevant?
December 18, 2009
Rumor has it Apple's begun shopping a tablet computer -- or "iPad," as it's been unofficially dubbed -- to publishers. Would Apple's entry into the e-book market spell doom for the Kindle, Nook and Daily Edition? Or is it more likely that an iPad might be a nice device for everything but books?
SSL Certificates: Safety, Nuisance or Both?
December 15, 2009
Online shoppers have become familiar with little logos that indicate a site can be trusted. Obviously, phishers and other scammers can easily place such logos on their own sites without proper authorization. What level of certainty can a consumer have that a site that bears a trusted logo really earned it from a reputable authenticator? What good are these reassurances, really?
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network