Welcome | Sign In
TechNewsWorld.com
Tech Buzz

OPINION
Tech's New Advocate in the California Capitol

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
Tech's New Advocate in the California Capitol

Economists have a name for what Commissioner Susan Kennedy so adeptly described: government failure. And it's clear that government failure is something that really irks her. Her policy positions at the Public Utilities Commission are as free-market as one could hope for in California, and there's no sign she's giving up on reform.


eMarketer Whitepaper: Optimizing the E-Commerce Experience
From the Web to the Contact Center, are you prepared to proactively engage and keep your savvy customers? Read how e-commerce leaders are optimizing their sites with ratings, reviews, live help, Web analytics, mobile and more.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger rocked the political world this week with the appointment of Susan Kennedy, a Democrat and Public Utilities Commissioner (PUC) as his chief of staff. Republicans might feel snubbed, but Kennedy's appointment is good for the technology sector.

A thriving technology sector is good for California, and next year key policy issues will affect both consumers and technology companies. These include the so-called "Consumer Bill of Rights," cable franchise reform, and broadband deployment.

Although the Golden State is home to Silicon Valley, many legislators remain surprisingly unaware of how their actions affect innovation, economic growth, and consumer well being. Now that Susan Kennedy is joining forces with the Governator, that ignorance should start to dissipate.

Blocking Growth

A hard-working and tough-talking Susan Kennedy didn't know much about telecommunications issues when she was appointed to the PUC just under three years ago. But after a lot of reading, observing, and discussing, she came to the same conclusion that any honest and informed person would: the telecommunications sector is over-regulated.

Over-regulation not only stymies growth and discourages investment, but it harms consumers. As a Democrat who made it her mission to do what was best for consumers, Kennedy became a staunch advocate for serious regulatory reform at the PUC. An example of this leadership was her opposition to the so-called "Consumer Bill of Rights" that would have raised mobile-phone bills and tied businesses in red tape. After the PUC initially voted for the Bill of Rights (BOR), Kennedy called a spade a spade.

"It's a good thing this Commission is not held to the same standards as the companies that do business in California," she said, "because if we were, today's decision would be an open and shut case of false and misleading advertising."

Kennedy applied pressure to her colleagues, and the harmful regulations were put on hold. Senator Martha Escutia then introduced BOR legislation in Sacramento that did not make it to the governor's desk, but that doesn't mean a similar bill next year won't. From her new perch in Sacramento, Kennedy will be able to advise a veto on any future fake consumer-rights bills, and she will also have input into who will replace her at the PUC.

Aiming for Change

Indeed, fellow Commissioner Geoffrey Brown seems convinced that Kennedy will not abandon efforts to reform the communications sector. He told the L.A. Times that "She'll be our sixth commissioner." One hopes he's right, because Kennedy not only understood how regulations were damaging the sector, but she also saw the harm from power-seeking on the part of the PUC.

Speaking at a telecommunications conference last year, Kennedy said of the Commission, "There's a plot in California to drive out all the small carriers [with burdensome rules], claim there's an oligopoly, and then regulate."

Economists have a name for what Commissioner Kennedy so adeptly described: government failure. And it's clear that government failure is something that really irks her. At a dinner event hosted by the Pacific Research Institute in Silicon Valley a few months ago, Kennedy revealed why she and Governor Schwarzenegger hit it off so well.

"We are both fighting for reform against people who eat reform people for breakfast," she said. That's a good way to look at it, and one should point out that she has done much to protect broadband against hungry regulators who would like to sink their teeth into the high-speed medium.

Committed to Reform

"Broadband Deployment in California" was a report prepared by Kennedy and her staff. It contained a wealth of facts and identified key policy problems responsible for slowing broadband rollout and economic growth. It also stood strong against obsolete and misleading claims in a report by Commissioner Geoffrey Brown and his staff. Brown's report said his recommendations should be followed because "it may develop into a framework in which California can regain regulatory authority from the FCC." In other words, it's all about power.

Susan Kennedy's policy positions at the PUC, on the other hand, were as free-market as one could hope for in California, and there's no sign she's giving up on reform. This should delight the technology industry and benefit consumers everywhere. Republicans horrified by Kennedy's appointment might check their own commitment to reform, smaller government, and a strong business climate.


Sonia Arrison, a TechNewsWorld columnist, is director of Technology Studies at the California-based Pacific Research Institute. She also serves on the Technology Advisory Board for the Acceleration Studies Foundation.



Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Sonia Arrison


More by Sonia Arrison

How to Solve the Net Neutrality Issue
October 28, 2009
Regulation by the U.S. government is not the way to keep the Internet neutral. A better approach would be self-regulation. Now is the time for ISPs to support an independent, private body to monitor neutrality issues and forestall the possibility of the FCC "managing competition" on the Internet.
FCC's Genachowski Not Neutral on New Net Rules
September 30, 2009
The proponents of Net neutrality say it's necessary for a free and open Internet, but history doesn't support that argument. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, for example, was supposed to bolster competition. Instead, by compelling companies to share their infrastructures, it reduced incentives for improvement. In the long run, it failed.
What Has President Obama Done for Silicon Valley?
August 28, 2009
President Obama's appointments of Silicon Valley outsiders were only the first indications that his administration would be less than friendly to the high-tech industry, despite campaign promises. Since then, it has shown an inclination toward tight regulatory practices and away from transparency.
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network