By Sonia Arrison TechNewsWorld
03/24/06 5:00 AM PT
The digital music market is still experimenting with different business models and products, and Apple is not the only player in the game. Governments from all countries need to back off and let entrepreneurs find the best ways to serve customers.
Tech Industry Paper - Finding Strength Through Customer Service Poised to capitalize on an upturn in the economy, technology companies are focused on retention & service. This paper, from Convergys, provides the latest research on customer experience for B2B & B2C technology customers. Learn more.
French legislators approved a bill this week that will force technology companies such as Apple Computer (Nasdaq: AAPL) to share proprietary technology with rivals. Such a move is not only a recipe for disaster but completely unnecessary.
The digital music market has always been a tumultuous place. For a long time, Hollywood and Silicon Valley battled over how to sell music while avoiding the theft of digital goods. Now that there's a truce and Apple's iTunes store just sold its 1 billionth legally downloadable song, it's more than a little ironic that the French government wants to essentially steal Apple's intellectual property.
"The French implementation of the EU Copyright Directive will result in state-sponsored piracy," Apple said in a statement. "If this happens, legal music sales will plummet just when legitimate alternatives to piracy are winning over customers."
Questionable Motives
It's not a given that a standardized platform would promote music piracy as Apple implies, but it is the case that if France's bill passes the Senate in May, the country will be endorsing the theft of Apple's intellectual property by its rivals. That's not a good outcome and one might wonder what is motivating the French to take such drastic action.
After one downloads a song from iTunes, it's true that the song can only be played using Apple's software or on an iPod portable music device. For someone who owns a different portable device, such as a Rio Player or an iRiver, the restrictions of the digital rights management (DRM) technology can be a little upsetting. Most people know, however, that it's possible to burn the songs on a CD and then re-rip the music in order to strip the DRM away and play the song on a different device. Apple has sold a lot of iPods, but it didn't sell a billion songs to iPod users alone.
Going through such measures in order to ensure interoperability between one's devices is a bit of a hassle, but what many people might not realize is that it's worth the trouble for the long-term gains in benefits to consumers. Consider that if Apple didn't use DRM technology, the record companies wouldn't let them sell their songs. Consider also that if companies aren't allowed the freedom to design and control their own products, consumers will end up with government controlled technology like France's MiniTel flop.
Innovation at Risk
The MiniTel, a monochrome teletext communication system, was created by France in 1982, but in October of 2000, France Telecom (NYSE: FTE) actually ran a US$4.1 million public relations campaign to promote its use. That French bureaucrats thought they could use old technology to compete with the Internet will make people wonder how much wine FT bosses had been consuming. But that's what happens when government takes over the innovation process: consumers get offered the MiniTel instead of the Internet.
If Apple isn't allowed to control and make profits using its property, it will lose incentives to innovate and invest. Most Americans understand this basic reality, and freedom to innovate is one of the reasons the United States outperforms other countries on the economic level.
Free markets work, and when a profitable and efficient way to offer consumers interoperability with digital music is found, the companies that adopt it will beat out the companies that refuse. That was the case in the operating system market way back in 1985 when Apple's Steve Jobs refused to license the Mac operating system to PC vendors. When Bill Gates was shut out of Apple's system, he didn't ask the government for help, he created a rival system that would allow for standardization and broad deployment, and that worked out extremely well for both consumers and Gates.
Be Patient
The digital music market is still experimenting with different business models and products, and Apple is not the only player in the game. Governments from all countries need to back off and let entrepreneurs find the best ways to serve their customers. Yes, consumers want to be able to transfer their music to the device of their choice, and that's why some consumers buy their music from Walmart.com or Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT) MSN music instead of from iTunes.
In time, some of the small annoyances digital music customers face will disappear. Governments need to be patient and do their job in protecting property rights. The French move to confiscate Apple's intellectual property would set a bad precedent that would hurt innovation and consumers in the long run.
Sonia Arrison, a TechNewsWorld columnist, is director of Technology Studies at the California-based Pacific Research Institute.
Interesting story. One clarification--it should be pointed out that the general consensus on ...
Next Article in Tech Buzz
Blog Battles: 'Netroots' Campaigning Making Politicians Sweat March 23, 2006
When President Bush entered the House chamber for the State of the Union address earlier this year, he was pictured hugging Rep. Henry Cuellar. That started a massive online movement to defeat Cuellar. Bloggers Markos "Kos" Moulitsas and Duncan "Atrios" Black led the campaign. Other bloggers joined in, and US$500,000 was raised to defeat Cueller.
Related Stories
Appreciating Updates, Anticipating ApTel Line October 24, 2005
We are anticipating that many of Apple's laptop products will simply no longer have an optical drive of any kind but instead will have a multiple format flash reader slot and an iPod docking port. When docked, future iPods will have access to some notebook functions and be usable as a secondary display.
PowerPC to X86: Will Apple Survive the Move? June 13, 2005
Were Apple to reverse it would be an embarrassment of biblical proportions to Intel and put massive pressure on the company to offset IBM's strategy. With both AMD and VIA also motivated to steal some of this business, holding onto Apple may become more difficult, and expensive, for Intel than getting them was.
Baby Apples: How the Apple Legacy Shapes New Products November 01, 2004
The OQO is the first fully functional laptop computer you can put in your pocket. Think of it as a wedding between a laptop and a RIM. Much like the original Mac, the OQO won't appeal to everyone: It is for those few who dream of something different, who want a product that is ahead of the curve.
Apple Replays Old Mistakes August 13, 2004
Apple's resolve to go it alone and not work with others backfired in the past and will do so again if it doesn't change its ways. A long time ago, Adam Smith made some observations that Steve Jobs would do well to note: Markets work best when individuals follow their self interest to serve others.
Related News Alerts
More by Sonia Arrison
How to Solve the Net Neutrality Issue October 28, 2009
Regulation by the U.S. government is not the way to keep the Internet neutral. A better approach would be self-regulation. Now is the time for ISPs to support an independent, private body to monitor neutrality issues and forestall the possibility of the FCC "managing competition" on the Internet.
FCC's Genachowski Not Neutral on New Net Rules September 30, 2009
The proponents of Net neutrality say it's necessary for a free and open Internet, but history doesn't support that argument. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, for example, was supposed to bolster competition. Instead, by compelling companies to share their infrastructures, it reduced incentives for improvement. In the long run, it failed.
What Has President Obama Done for Silicon Valley? August 28, 2009
President Obama's appointments of Silicon Valley outsiders were only the first indications that his administration would be less than friendly to the high-tech industry, despite campaign promises. Since then, it has shown an inclination toward tight regulatory practices and away from transparency.