By Sonia Arrison TechNewsWorld
06/23/06 5:00 AM PT
If Congress and other lawmakers decide to treat the Internet like telecommunications by passing net neutrality regulations, disallowing the reform of barriers to entry in cable and allowing for government-run muni WiFi, then Netizens should brace for the worst. The Internet, as we know it, will be over.
Think you have to compromise on security to save on costs? Think Again. Trend Micro™ Enterprise Security, powered by the Trend Micro Smart Protection Network™, can lower your content security management costs by up to 40%. Find out just how much you’ll save with our TCO Impact Calculator.
As Congress draws closer to passing significant telecommunications reforms, it's clear that a larger issue serves as a backdrop to the hot topics of net neutrality, cable franchise reform, and municipal WiFi. That is, will the Internet be treated like telecommunications, or the other way around?
New technologies have caused a convergence in the communications sector so that the phone company can also be the cable company and vice versa. Indeed, an Internet company can also provide cable and phone services. eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY) bought Skype, an Internet phone company that offers free calling, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is moving into the IPTV space, and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) offers voice services integrated with features like instant messaging.
Government's Role
All this activity is great news for consumers, as it increases choice and pushes down prices. There used to be a time when a long-distance call was something one had to be careful about because it was so expensive, but now most of us don't give it a second thought. Cable is undergoing a similar change and, if things go right, prices will continue to drop for broadband even as speeds continue to increase.
Consider that prices for DSL service have lowered from an average of about US$30 to $40 just a couple of years ago to $17.95 today. But progress is not guaranteed and the hottest issues today -- such as net neutrality, cable franchise reform, and muni WiFi -- all come down to a key question: What is the proper role of government?
In the telecommunications space, the government traditionally assumed an enormous role -- not only in arbitrating disputes, but also in setting prices, determining market entrants, and governing internal business procedures such as how many minutes are acceptable for a consumer to be on hold waiting for service. That type of micromanagement was a disaster. Yes, the telecoms still made money for a period under that regime, but the loss of flexibility impaired future investment, harming consumers and stifling innovation. The Internet is a different story.
The government did have a role in initially creating the Internet, but after its creation, regulators took a "hands off" approach. This freedom has created gigantic benefits not only for Americans, but also for individuals all over the globe. Anyone who questions this reality should consider what products from a company like Microsoft or Google would have looked like if the government had tried to micromanage the marketplace as it did in the telecom space. Instead of the desktop computer, Americans could have been saddled with Minitel-type terminals like those the French government concocted.
End of an Era?
There are two potential futures for communications technologies in America. If Congress and other lawmakers decide to treat the Internet like telecommunications by passing net neutrality regulations, disallowing the reform of barriers to entry in cable and allowing for government-run muni WiFi, then Netizens should brace for the worst. The Internet, as we know it, will be over. If government gets involved in making decisions that properly belong in the marketplace, the innovation and freedom that have come to be associated with the Net will fade away.
On the other hand, legislators can choose a more prudent course. They can refuse to micromanage the Net with neutrality regulations, pass cable franchise reform to allow freer entry by new competitors in the cable market, and discourage governments from unfairly competing with the private sector using tax dollars. Such actions will place America on a better path that reaffirms freedom and innovation. Entrepreneurs will be turned loose to create new technological wonders.
Congress is abuzz with telecom reform, and the players and issues are many. While it can seem complex to the outsider, ultimately the core issue is simple. If government substitutes its political decisions for those of consumers and businesses in the marketplace, the Internet will be frozen out of the future. If the government decides to regulate lightly, we will all get the next-gen Net that we want. With so much at stake, all Americans should be keeping a close watch on their legislators.
Sonia Arrison, a TechNewsWorld columnist, is director of Technology Studies at the California-based Pacific Research Institute.
This is one of the poorer arguments in the net-neutrality debate, to ...
Next Article in Tech Buzz
Netscape Rebuilds, Creative Slaps Apple, Gates Rides Into the Sunset June 19, 2006
Bill Gates represents a great deal of what is right and wrong with Microsoft. He has been at the core of the company's partnering expertise, as well as its ability to "embrace and extend" in response to competitive threats, and to reinvent on a regular basis. He also exemplifies, though, somewhat of an over-commitment problem the company has.
Related Stories
Music Technology: Making It in Internet Radio May 22, 2006
Internet radio broadcasters earned their place in the music marketplace by serving and cultivating active listeners and using interactive digital technology to build up new niche music markets and communities around them. They tapped into their listeners not only for listening time, but for talent and content as well.
Dopy Internet Legislation Hurts Kids May 19, 2006
Child predators are a real and serious problem, but the answer isn't to turn off access for legitimate users. A better approach is first to refocus law enforcement so that the Internet is a normal place of patrol, and, second, to engage parents and businesses.
Don't Tax the Internet March 03, 2006
America is already ranked a lowly 16th in broadband deployment, and moves to saddle the medium with old and dysfunctional programs will only make it worse. That's not telecom reform, only a sneaky move at new taxes and regulation.
Related News Alerts
More by Sonia Arrison
How to Solve the Net Neutrality Issue October 28, 2009
Regulation by the U.S. government is not the way to keep the Internet neutral. A better approach would be self-regulation. Now is the time for ISPs to support an independent, private body to monitor neutrality issues and forestall the possibility of the FCC "managing competition" on the Internet.
FCC's Genachowski Not Neutral on New Net Rules September 30, 2009
The proponents of Net neutrality say it's necessary for a free and open Internet, but history doesn't support that argument. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, for example, was supposed to bolster competition. Instead, by compelling companies to share their infrastructures, it reduced incentives for improvement. In the long run, it failed.
What Has President Obama Done for Silicon Valley? August 28, 2009
President Obama's appointments of Silicon Valley outsiders were only the first indications that his administration would be less than friendly to the high-tech industry, despite campaign promises. Since then, it has shown an inclination toward tight regulatory practices and away from transparency.