Attention Marketers: Access 30 Million IT Decision Makers with ECT News Network's INSTA-LEADS · Click to Learn More!
Welcome Guest | Sign In

Time Warner Q1 Profit Beats Street

Time Warner Q1 Profit Beats Street

Surging advertising sales on AOL and strong subscriber growth in its cable, Internet and phone businesses pushed Time Warner to profit growth in the first quarter that exceeded analyst forecasts. The media giant reported earnings of $1.2 billion. Last summer, AOL began offering its services for free to attract more users as well as more online ad dollars.

By Tim Gray E-Commerce Times ECT News Network
May 2, 2007 2:35 PM PT

Time Warner has reported first-quarter profits that outperformed Wall Street expectations, mostly on the strength of its rise in new cable, Internet and phone subscribers, as well as strong online ad sales.

Shares of the world's largest media company rose more than 3 percent as it reported a 40 percent increase in AOL advertising.

Although earnings fell to US$1.2 billion, or 31 cents per share, from $1.5 billion, or 32 cents per share, a year earlier, those numbers included a gain of 6 cents per share from a string of asset and investment sales.

The New York-based company reported sales of $11.2 billion -- in line with analysts' forecasts and up 9 percent from a year earlier.

Ad growth at AOL this year is likely to be at or above U.S. industry rates, but probably below 40 percent, according to Time Warner.

Internet Ad Sales Hot

The company's strategy of building its share of the fast-growing Internet advertising market while letting income from subscriptions rise has been successful, said Bruce McGregor, senior analyst with Current Analysis.

"The results benefited from double-digit percentage profit increases at the AOL and cable services divisions," McGregor told the E-Commerce Times. "They are still building the services out."

The cable business was the main driver of the higher revenues, up 61 percent.

Weaker Divisions

As expected, strength in Time Warner's cable operations was offset by weakness in its film division, where revenue fell 1 percent to $2.7 billion.

Time Warner's movie studios, including Warner Brothers, faced tough competition last year. Movie division revenue failed to beat year-earlier sales boosted by "Harry Potter" and "Wedding Crashers" DVDs.

Other divisions were also flat, according to Time Warner. The company's publishing unit revenue fell 1 percent, and operating income declined 49 percent because of higher restructuring costs.

Giving It Away

Last summer, AOL began offering its services for free to attract eyeballs as well as online ad dollars.

So far, says McGregor, the strategy seems to be paying off.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ RSS
Is native advertising good for journalism?
Yes -- It's a reasonable source of additional revenue for media outlets to support their traditional editorial efforts.
Yes -- Paid-for articles can contain useful information, but readers might bypass them if they look too much like ads.
Maybe -- But only if it's clearly labeled as paid-for content.
No -- I don't trust any information from media outlets that cloak paid-for content as objective journalism.
No -- Native advertising is confusing and devious, and it threatens the fabric of traditional journalism.
I Don't Know -- I don't understand what native advertising is.
PENN STATE ONLINE Information Technology Degrees and Certificates