As someone who is familiar with the coverage that surrounds the iPhone, I was puzzled by Tuesday's announcement from AT&T (NYSE: T)
about a new way to buy the gadget.
My first reaction: Something must be missing.
Some of the details surrounding AT&T's iPhone prices make little sense, writes Eric Benderoff. The company will sell a 3G iPhone with no contract for a $400 premium. Unlocked phones aren't uncommon, but that $599 iPhone will only be unlocked from a contract, not from the carrier -- it'll still have to use AT&T. Why not just buy the $199 version and pay the $175 early contract termination fee?
![]()
PEER 1 takes the complexity out of running your online business, so that you can focus on the possibilities. The ValuePro Managed Hosting Plan at just $299 is fully loaded to save you valuable time and resources. Learn more.
As someone who is familiar with the coverage that surrounds the iPhone, I was puzzled by Tuesday's announcement from AT&T (NYSE: T)
about a new way to buy the gadget.
My first reaction: Something must be missing.
Second reaction: Why would anyone pay more for the iPhone if there's no additional benefit?
That's a $400 option.
It could be worth the cost if you really dislike AT&T's service and wanted to use the phone on another carrier. However, you can't.
Both the iPhone 3G
"contract" phones, which go on sale July 11 for $199 and $299, and the contract-free phones will work only on AT&T's network
, spokesperson Michael Coe told The Associated Press.
AT&T's early-termination fee is a maximum of $175 and, as of May 25, that fee is reduced by $5 for each month you own the phone. That's a lot less than $400.
Why would you do this? When I asked an AT&T spokesperson, she said it is an option for people who don't want to sign a contract. We agreed someone really must hate contracts to spend more than twice the termination fee for this privilege.
Perhaps the iPhone has a removable SIM card. That's what an "unlocked" phone offers, meaning you are not tied to any specific wireless carrier. However, the first iPhone was made so the SIM card could not be removed.
With a traditional "unlocked" phone, you pay more for the phone because it is not tied to a specific carrier and, therefore, it is sold without the usual subsidy. Many people, this blogger included, have bought phones this way.
Unless AT&T or Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL)
is not being entirely forthcoming here, I can't understand why I would pay $400 more if the phone is still locked to AT&T's network.
What am I missing?
© 2008 Chicago Tribune. All rights reserved.
© 2008 ECT News Network. All rights reserved.
Next Article in iPhone:
Mac Bloggers Gnash Teeth Over iPhone Pricing Numbers
Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
![]()
Related News Alerts