By Jay Lyman LinuxInsider Part of the ECT News Network
03/02/04 9:30 AM PT
Linux developers -- which are increasing in number and are now numerically even with Windows developers, according to some estimates -- are more squarely focused on the advances of Linux and other open-source software rather than the SCO case, according to a survey by Evans Data Corporation.
Think you have to compromise on security to save on costs? Think Again. Trend Micro™ Enterprise Security, powered by the Trend Micro Smart Protection Network™, can lower your content security management costs by up to 40%. Find out just how much you’ll save with our TCO Impact Calculator.
A buzz of activity in the SCO-Linux legal saga probably is not distracting Linux developers from their work, according to a survey by Evans Data Corporation that indicates more than 90 percent of those developers believe SCO's claim to own source code used in Linux has no merit.
SCO Group, a Utah software company, has shaken up the open-source community and larger software industry with its claims and lawsuits, including a multibillion-dollar contract suit against IBM (NYSE: IBM), a defense against Linux vendor Red Hat's countersuit and another case with Novell.
While the company has made few friends since making its claims and threatening end users if they declined to purchase a Linux license, SCO now has announced that Houston-based hosting company EV1.Net (Everyones Internet) will be its first Linux licensee. SCO also claims it is poised this week to take a major end user to court over unauthorized use of SCO's intellectual property via Linux.
Linux developers may be less concerned with SCO than they are with building and improving Linux programs. But to a large degree, the credibility of the developer community as a whole is at stake based on SCO's claims, according to Harvard Research Group vice president of Linux strategy Bill Claybrook.
"I would expect most Linux developers to say what they said," Claybrook told LinuxInsider. "On the other hand, if there is code that has been moved from Unix to Linux, if it did get moved, it got there through a developer, so they do have some stake in this. They do have some part in the results of this lawsuit."
Little Fear Effect
Nevertheless, Linux developers -- who are increasing in number and now numerically equal Windows developers, according to some estimates -- are more squarely focused on the advances of Linux and other open-source software, according to Evans.
"Most people realize that by demanding licensing fees, SCO wants the benefit of a court decision without actually trying the case, which is why their rants are met with jeers instead of fear," said Evans Linux analyst Nicholas Petreley.
Evans reported that nearly 60 percent of respondents to its Spring 2004 Linux Development Survey have evaluated intellectual-property risks of Linux, with 13 percent indicating the SCO lawsuit will "probably" or "absolutely" impact their company's adoption of Linux.
Two in five developers believe Linux distributors should offer guarantees against the potential impact of the suit, while nearly two-thirds think the case will have only a minor effect on Linux development.
Just Thinking Java
Evans' Petreley also referred to developers' focus instead on the growing momentum of Java programming for Linux, with the survey indicating use of the Java-based Eclipse integrated development environment (IDE) has grown 80 percent in the last year. Evans credited Eclipse's variety of plug-ins that allow development of nearly all application types.
"Java is having a breakout year in Linux development," Petreley said. "The open-source Java-based Eclipse development environment has shown astonishing growth in the past few years, and Java-based NetBeans isn't far behind."
Yankee Group senior analyst Dana Gardner told LinuxInsider that Java and Linux tend to complement one another, and he confirmed the momentum of the open-source programming language and operating system.
Corporate Caution
Claybrook said that although Linux developers surely are hoping for an outcome favorable to IBM and Linux -- and probably are following developments in the dispute -- they are not worried about the impact of SCO's suits.
"It doesn't affect their day-to-day work," Claybrook said.
However, the analyst did say that developers probably have become much more careful about where code comes from. He referred to developer training from companies such as IBM and HP (NYSE: HPQ) geared toward avoiding intellectual-property issues, which become increasingly complex as open-source code is mixed with proprietary code.
Following With Faith
Evans' Petreley, who referred to this year's survey as the second consecutive poll showing developers are not fearful from the SCO suit, told LinuxInsider that more than half of Linux developers are still investigating the licensing and other issues of the case.
"They're somewhat disinterested, but they're obviously following the SCO suit," Petreley said. "They're not afraid of what SCO can accomplish."
The analyst added that there is an overarching belief that even if IBM did not prevail in the suit, Big Blue would protect its customers and users, including funding losses.
"[Linux developers] also think the outcome is not going to affect them much," he said.
Report: Hands Off DRM Legislation March 02, 2004
Luke Gordon, a lawyer with Goldman Sachs, said the biggest problem facing the supply
side of the content business is fear. "Most content owners, whether they be music companies or publishing houses, are terrified of the Internet," Gordon told the E-Commerce Times.
Related Stories
Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy March 01, 2004
What is Groklaw's actual influence? Is it a soapbox for a bunch of wild-eyed zealots and naive idealists, or a serious attempt at -- in one supporter's words -- illuminating the darkness? While the site has attracted wide praise from most members of the open-source community, others dismiss or vilify it.
SCO Director of Public Relations Blake Stowell Speaks Out February 27, 2004
"The fact that developers around the world can collaborate on projects together to create something for the general good of society is an incredible thing," SCO's Blake Stowell told LinuxInsider. "I've worked with a lot of companies and individuals that have made some great contributions to open source. SCO has both contributed to and benefited from open-source software."
MyDoom.F Spreads Carnage with Malicious Payload February 25, 2004
Among the files MyDoom.F attempts to delete are .bmp and .jpg graphic files, .avi movie files, Microsoft Word .doc files, Microsoft Excel .xls files, and Microsoft Access .mdb files. Sophos analyst Graham Cluley estimated the worm's overall success rate as averaging about 40 percent in this regard.
Beyond Software Quality: The Ethics of Freedom February 16, 2004
This story was originally published on December 29, 2003, and is brought to you today as part of our Best of ECT News series.
OSDL: Ignore SCO's Linux Legal Threats February 11, 2004
SCO spokesperson Blake Stowell told LinuxInsider that the company remains on track to take a would-be Linux licensee to court this month. "We still stand behind what we said November 19th, which was that we would be in court within 90 days," Stowell said. "That's still our intention."
Related News Alerts
More by Jay Lyman
Open Source Developer Dumps Novell Over Microsoft Deal December 26, 2006
A key open source developer, Jeremy Allison, who cofounded the Samba project, has resigned from Novell in protest over the company's recent agreement to enter a collaborative arrangement with Microsoft. The deal has created an uproar in the open source community because it does not treat all recipients of the GPL equally and thus violates the spirit of the license, critics say.
Financial Firms Tap Microsoft for Linux December 22, 2006
Three major financial institutions are among the first companies to go to Microsoft for Linux services, provided through an agreement the software giant struck with Novell. Although a recent survey showed customer approval of the collaboration, many members of the open source community view Novell's move as sleeping with the devil.
Mozilla Beefs Up Security in Firefox 2.0 December 21, 2006
Mozilla's latest update to its open source Firefox browser includes security measures targeting phishers. Phishing scams that use social engineering techniques to dupe Web surfers into revealing personal financial information have become an effective way for cybercriminals to conduct their nefarious activities on the Internet.