B2B Marketers » Reach Pre-Qualified IT Decision Makers with a Custom Lead Gen Program » Get Details
Welcome Guest | Sign In
TechNewsWorld.com

Autodesk's Stingray Gets Into Video Game Guts

By Quinten Plummer
Aug 4, 2015 4:17 PM PT
autodesk-stingray-game-engine

Tired of serving as just a pretty face, Autodesk on Monday announced that it's putting its muscle into the business of making video games. The new Stingray engine, introduced at the Game Developers Conference, pulls together Autodesk's efforts in the games space.

Autodesk later in August will offer Stingray worldwide for US$30 a month -- and it will make the game engine available to Maya LT Desktop Subscription customers before the summer's close.

Stringray is a cross-platform engine that supports Xbox One, PlayStation 4, the Oculus Rift, Windows, Android and iOS.

The industry is shifting toward new technologies such as virtual and augmented reality, and Stringray was built with those "new complexities" for indie game developers in mind, said Chris Bradshaw, Autodesk senior vice president of media and entertainment.

Autodesk

"Stingray makes it easy and intuitive for artists with varying skill sets and programming expertise to create the next generation of 3D blockbuster games, entertainment and even architecture," Bradshaw said.

Stingray's Innards

Autodesk built Stringray to be flexible and familiar. Developers can alter the engine and renderer without having to access Stringray's source code.

It's cross-platform support allows developers to roll out gameplay and graphical changes to multiple platforms at once, which helps smaller studios stay agile and competitive.

Stingray's toolkit includes Autodesk's animation middleware HumanIK, it's user interface development tool Scaleform Studio, its artificial intelligence engine Navigation, its Beast lighting system, its data exchange SDK FBX, Audiokinetic's sound engine Wwise and Nvidia's PhysX engine.

With its "one-click workflow," Stingray's nervous system ties all the pieces together. There's a live link between Stingray and Autodesk's animation software.

Autodesk appears to have checked off every box for a next-generation game engine. It already has succeeded in the computer-aided design market, but now it has to answer the question, where will it go next? suggested Charles King, principal analyst for Pund-IT.

"3D gaming's sizzling growth pace makes it an attractive commercial target, which is why Autodesk acquired the Bitsquid engine (Stingray's underlying tech) last year," he told TechNewsWorld. "But Autodesk also has numerous other development tools and applications that complement Stingray, meaning that what we're seeing is just the opening gambit in a long strategic effort."

Stingray's Barb

Along with its cross-platform support and deep integration with Autodesk's other tools, Stingray's profile is raised by its parentage: Autodesk.

Developers already use several of Autodesk's tools on competing game engines, noted Rob Enderle, principal analyst for the Enderle Group.

"It creates a suite of game developer tools that together can become both a stronger offense and defense through ever tighter integration with their existing leading developer tools," he told TechNewsWorld.

Stingray is entering waters filled with apex predators such as CryTech's CryEngine and the Unreal 4 engine, which was released earlier this year.

However, the cocktail of venom in Stingray's barb is made more potent by its cross-platform support and low overhead, noted King.

"As a new entry to an established yet still growing market, Autodesk seems to be positioning Stingray as a powerful yet highly affordable alternative to mainstream 3D platforms like Unity 5 and Unreal 4," he said. "Stingray's $30 per month per seat subscription price should make it attractive to small and midsize studios that aren't firmly wed to one of the larger platforms."


Quinten Plummer is a longtime technology reporter and an avid PC gamer who explored local news for a few years, covering law enforcement and government beats, before returning to writing about things run by ones and zeros and the people who make them. If it pushes pixels or improves lives, he wants to learn all he can about it.


What do you see as the biggest obstacle to mainstream adoption of video calling?
Too many steps are required to reach a contact.
Video quality is often poor -- dropped calls, frozen images.
There's no advantage to face-to-face communication in most cases.
Too many people feel uncomfortable on live cameras.
There are too many security and privacy issues.
The trend is away from personal engagement and toward texting.
The obstacles are fading, and video calling is well on its way to adoption.
Salesforce Commerce Solution Guide