China has issued an order that all foreign-made computerequipment and software be removed from government offices andpublic institutions within the next three years.
The news of Beijing’s move came earlier this week in a report from the Nikkei-owned, London-based Financial Times.
China has estimated that upwards of 30 million pieces of hardware will need to be replaced, the paper noted.
This is just the latest salvo in the ongoing trade war between theUnited States and China, the world’s two largest national economies.It began last year when President Donald J. Trump began to set tariffsand other trade barriers on China. The goal of the White House’spolicy was to address what the president has called “unfair tradepractices,” which included a growing trade deficit, theft ofintellectual property, and the forced transfer of American tech toChina.
This latest round has been dubbed a “tech cold war,” as China nowhas banned the use of U.S. tech in government facilities, which could be a response to the Trump administration’s ban on the use of Chinese-madehardware by U.S. government agencies and government contractors.
The White House this summer banned all federal agencies from doingbusiness with Huawei, ZTE, Hytera, Hikvision and Dahua over fears that the companies could plant surveillancedevices and gather sensitive information — including U.S. tradesecrets — and supply that information to the Chinese government.
The order from the White House came a year before theCongress-mandated deadline of next August for all federal contractorsto cease business with those Chinese firms. A number of U.S. companies, suchas Google, Intel and Qualcomm, announced they would ceaseworking with Huawei.
The Office of Management and Budget this summer releaseda statement on its strong commitment to defending the UnitedStates from foreign adversaries, including with respect to guarding tradesecrets. Legislation aimed directly at Chinese tech companies was included in the defense spending bill passed last year.
China’s ban could impact such U.S. multinational firms as Dell, HP and Microsoft.
21st Century Haijin
This ban on U.S. computer products could be viewed as a modern version of the”Haijin,” or sea ban — a series of isolationist Chinesepolices that began in the 14th century under the Ming dynasty, with the goal of putting an end to Japanese maritime piracy. It was applied again under the QingDynasty beginning in the 17th century, limiting maritime tradingand coastal settlement, but that eventually led to smuggling –including the illicit opium trade — and then to conflicts with GreatBritain and other European powers.
While the intent of Haijin largely was to reduce outside influence, China never completely closed itself to the West or to Western goods.
China’s current ban on foreign products should not be viewed as isolationist in its intent, but rather as a direct result of the trade war. It also could be a way to build up the “home team” companies in China.
Lenovo is one such company that could benefit from the move, as it could be among the firms called upon to replace Western hardware.
Other firms likely will be hurt by not being able to offer products to Western markets.
“China’s response could very well be seen as a tit-for-tat response,” remarked Javvad Malik, security awareness advocate at KnowBe4.
“The move illustrates just how important and integral to everyone’slife technology has become, to the point that it is used as a politicalbargaining tool,” he told TechNewsWorld.
Tech Cold War
The question now is whether this is just the latest round of salvos inthe ongoing trade war, or whether this ban on Western hardware couldresult in a very serious tech cold war — one that might not be resolvedquickly, or even ever.
“At this point it’s hard to tell whether it represents a serioustactical decision by China’s government or is merely a strategic feintaimed at President Trump’s bellicose attempts at trade warfare,” saidCharles King, principal analyst at Pund-IT.
“The gradual implementation of the plan, with 30 percent of U.S.hardware replaced by the end of next year, could be easily rescindedif the president loses his bid for re-election or leaves office priorto November,” he told TechNewsWorld.
Government purchasing represents just a tiny portion ofoverall tech spending in China, so this may not have a huge impact forU.S. tech companies. It may not affect some U.S. techcompanies directly or indirectly.
“It’s also unclear — since the Chinese haven’t officially responded toqueries — how ‘U.S. tech company products’ are defined,” added King.
“That is, does it mean literally any product made by any IT vendorheadquartered in the U.S.?” he pondered. “Or does it refer to productsmanufactured in the U.S. by those vendors?”
If the former is the case, then achieving the plan’s stated goals could bedifficult, since China still has a way to go before it is able todevelop and deliver hardware and software that equals, let alonesurpasses, the quality of U.S. technologies.
New Operating System
Given the state of China’s tech industry, moving to domestically sourced hardware exclusively would not be without problems for the country. Computer hardware wouldneed to be replaced, of course, but a bigger issue is that the ban couldrequire replacing Microsoft, Apple and Google software.
China’s software industry trails the United States, and it is unclearif it could develop operating systems and applications comparable to those available from American firms, or provide the related services to support them.
“While current products may not be a perfect feature-by-feature fit, there definitely are more than enough homegrown offerings and talent available to have a viable alternative product,” said KnowBe4’s Malik.
For U.S. firms, China’s move might be far less significant.
“The effect of the ban would be relatively benign if it only impactsU.S.-manufactured solutions, since virtually every major U.S. ITvendor supports global supply chains with manufacturing performed inmultiple facilities outside the U.S.,” explained King.
“If that’s the case, vendors could easily find ways to continue doingbusiness that wouldn’t violate the spirit of the ban,” he noted.
A Less-Connected World
The lasting impact of this 21st century Haijin may be more serious than whetherU.S. tech products are sold and used in China, or whether Chinese hardware is used inthe West. It could trigger a complete disconnect in the digital world. China maynot become completely isolated, but it could become far more difficult to make digital connections with people in China.
“If this trend continues and more countries take to blockingtechnology, apps or services from certain countries, we could end upwith a highly fragmented or Balkanized Internet,” Malik warned, “which could undo much of the progress that has been made over the years.”