Biotech Push Needed to Avert Global Food Crisis, Scientists Warn

World leaders must embrace agricultural biotechnology if they are to cope with the severe food shortages likely to result from global warming in the coming decades, warns a group of scientists.

Yields from some of the most important crops for human consumption begin to decline sharply when average temperatures exceed about 30 degrees Celsius, or 86 Fahrenheit, they explain in an article that will appear Friday in the journal Science.

As a result, “you’re looking at a 20 percent to 30 percent decline in production yields in the next 50 years for major crops between the latitudes of southern California or southern Europe to South Africa,” said David Battisti, a University of Washington atmospheric sciences professor and coauthor of the article.

Countries around the globe, then, need to “get beyond popular biases against the use of agricultural biotechnology,” particularly crops genetically modified to produce greater yields in harsher conditions, the scientists said.

9 Billion by 2050

Even without climate change, feeding the world’s population will be increasingly difficult as that population increases — likely by more than 30 percent to 9 billion people in 2050.

That alone would require doubling grain production in the tropics, Battisti said.

A warmer climate, however, will reduce yields at a time when they’re needed most, because many temperatures will be too high to achieve the most efficient photosynthesis. For every temperature increase of one degree Celsius, in fact, yields tend to go down by 10 percent, Battisti told TechNewsWorld.

“The projected changes in temperature due to global warming will put a lot of really basic stresses on plants,” he said.

‘Further Stress on Plants’

In the tropics and subtropics, in fact — between roughly 30 degrees North and 30 degrees South — the optimal temperatures for photosynthesis are already exceeded, explained Battisti.

“If you add global warming on top of that, you find that it puts further stress on plants,” he pointed out.

Even if emissions were reduced dramatically in the coming years, it would still result in yield reductions of at least 20 percent by midcentury, he asserted, with further reductions due to increasing pressure from pests and pathogens.

‘Already Taking Its Toll’

“We are well aware through our emergency work responding to drought/famine/flood that climate change is already taking its toll on agricultural yields in many parts of the developing world,” Jennifer Parmelee, senior spokesperson with the United Nations World Food Program (WFP), told TechNewsWorld.

The WFP works to address the impact of climate change through food-for-work programs “that include agricultural rehabilitation such as building of microdams, terraces and other water catchments, and replanting of trees and shrubs to prevent further erosion and loss of precious topsoil,” Parmelee explained.

Places including Ethiopia and Haiti, for example, are both “massively deforested,” she noted.

A ‘Major Starvation Catastrophe’

So far, there hasn’t been much attempt to breed crops resistant to heat stress, Battisti noted.

The result of all these increasing pressures could lead to a “major starvation catastrophe” by the end of this century among the more than 3 billion people who live relatively close to the equator, along with a plethora of food shortages elsewhere, the report’s authors warn.

“I grow increasingly concerned that we have not yet understood what it will take to feed a growing population on a warming planet,” said lead author Nina Federoff, who is science and technology adviser to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and biology professor at Pennsylvania State University.

What’s needed are systems that have the potential to decrease the land, energy and fresh water needed for agriculture while reducing the pollution associated with agricultural chemicals and animal waste, the authors wrote.

The Green Revolution

The so-called Green Revolution in agriculture produced a 2 percent increase in yields per year for 20 years, Battisti noted, primarily through development of new grain varieties along with fertilizer and irrigation.

“We’re really asking for yield gains comparable to those at the peak of the Green Revolution, but sustained for an unprecedented length of time — 40 years — and at a time when climate change is acting against us,” he said.

Also complicating matters is that many of the institutions involved do not work together closely enough to succeed, the authors charged. Then, too, there’s the continued resistance to crops such as corn and soybeans that have been genetically modified to be insect resistant and tolerant of herbicides.

No Silver Bullet

“There has to be a lot of creative thinking, a greater blending of biotechnology and agriculture, and better coordination between private and public research efforts throughout the world for us to keep pace with the increasing demand for food,” Battisti said. “We need to be thinking about the long-term demands for food and the environmental and social ramifications of how we will produce it.”

There is no “silver bullet,” Battisti added; rather, the solution will have to involve a combination of things.

Specifically, it will mean changing agronomy, or the way humans farm, and in some cases, it will be a matter of changing varieties to more heat-tolerant versions.

“That’s a time-consuming process,” Battisti noted. “We’ll have maybe three shots before mid-century to make current varieties more resilient to heat.”

Sugar Cane and Teff

There will also be the need for better education and irrigation, he pointed out, and “in some cases, there will have to be changes in the kinds of crops we grow.”

The major grains that are grown today — including wheat, corn, soy and rice — don’t tend to do well in high heats, Battisti explained.

Sorghum and sugar cane, on the other hand, tend to do pretty well if they get enough water. Teff — a crop that’s grown in parts of Africa — is another promising candidate, he pointed out.

‘Yields Will Go Down, and Soon’

Reactions to the report’s recommendations have generally been positive, particularly in the agricultural community, Battisti told TechNewsWorld.

“Occasionally we hear from a farmer up in Canada,” he noted. Even there, though, “by the time we get to the end of the century, they will have those reductions in yields too.”

Meanwhile, “anywhere south of San Francisco,” he concluded — “including Africa and most of Asia — yields will go down, and soon.”

2 Comments

  • I never was a follower of anyone or anything but when I first heard of global warming it just made sense without much thought of my own I thought no harm & went along with it. It quickly turned to Non-Sense when I had seen the "Greens" set mandates for CFL’s to replace incandescent light which stopped me in my tracks. Poison the enviornment with Mercury to save on energy costs. That, I found Irrational, in addition I have used a dozen CFL’s in my home for the last 2 years & have found on average the lifespan was in most cases inferior to Incandescents (I replace 1 every 3 months or so & have no electrical problem here) in addition like fluorescent tubes they create a lot of electrical interference. In our country The Market use to determine what products would survive & which will die which worked efficently for the people & for the Enviornment which, it is no longer the case.

    When that mandate came to light I did my own research & found it is actually getting colder &, if there was global warming for the last few decades we definitely wouldn’t be breaking coldest year records now. Interestingly as well this winter all 50 states had at least some snow. There is a higher power telling Us there is NO Global Warming, that higher Power should be the People of the US of A but it seems to be coming from a higher source. For the last 2 years I have seen control of our country’s destiny leaving the hands of the people & flowing to the hands of Government, local and Federal. Danger-Danger. Over 300 million minds are always more Intelligent & rational then the minds of the few in Government. I Sincerely believe this is an attempt to control our future just as "Nationalized Healthcare" will take away our Freedom Of Choice. They want to own our future. We all need to wake up and sense the weeds growing before US. We are moving from a Government For the People & By The People to a People For The Government & By The Government. That will endanger Us from the inside & from the outside & bring Us down from a Wealthy, rational & Sane World Power to a 3rd world country. That, I find "In Sane".

  • The solution to the problem is very easy. Americans and the world need to make charcoal (bio-char) and plow it into the soil. All organic material can be turned into bio-char using mostly the energy from the gas generated as heat drives it out of the organic material. Once plowed into the soil the bio-char (carbon) stays there for at least one thousand years. This increases crop production and takes carbon out of the atmosphere without removing oxygen as carbon-dioxide sequestration does. Lets quit talking and do this easy low tech solution.

Leave a Comment

Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.

Technewsworld Channels