The Christian Coalition of America has fallen hook, line and sinker for spurious Big Music cartel claims that P2P file sharing applications have a major role in the existence of online pornography, including child porn.
How Much is 'Free' Costing You? Learn how DaveRamsey.com saw a 567% uplift in ROI with Omniture. This complimentary guide and webinar cover the most important factors in selecting an analytics solution. Download Now.
The MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) is trying to persuade the Supreme Court to overturn a lower court ruling that P2P companies aren't responsible for what users do with P2P technologies. Meanwhile, the movie industry trade group is suing more people it says are illegally distributing films online.
MPAA officials won't say how many lawsuits they've filed, or where. Nor will they say if any of the pirated movies in question originated with Academy Award "screeners," copies of nominated films that are sent to Academy voters so they can view them at home.
A report from AT&T (NYSE: T) Labs' Secure Systems Research program says that of 285 underground movies sampled, 77 percent were leaked by industry insiders.
Whom To Sue?
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences member Carmine Caridi, 70, was recently ordered to pay Warner Bros. US$300,000 for providing copies of "The Last Samurai" and "Mystic River" to Russell Sprague, 51, who then posted them on the P2P networks.
Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" was the most-posted movie on P2P networks in April last year. Gibson sued not file sharers but a Hollywood post-production company.
When asked about the new lawsuits, however, John Malcolm, MPAA director of worldwide anti-piracy operations, told the Los Angeles Daily News, "This is something we feel we must do."
He added, "The litigation targets movie fans who share digitized versions of films over peer-to-peer networks. Under the United States Copyright Act, each violator could be subject to fines of between $30,000 and $150,000 per violation."
Scare Tactics
Meanwhile, the Christian Coalition of America has fallen hook, line and sinker for spurious Big Music cartel claims that P2P file sharing applications have a major role in the existence of online pornography.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in the P2P case on March 29. Briefs from Grokster and Morpheus, the principal defendants, and their supporters are expected today.
With senators Orrin Hatch and Pat Leahy leading the way, the four major record labels have been using the specter of online pornography, particularly child porn, to persuade groups such as the CCA -- which has zero interest in the music industry -- into backing them as they try to crush P2P file sharing, which, they claim, is devastating their multibillion-dollar businesses.
"File-swapping services make pornography easily accessible to minors, the social conservatives submit," says the Associated Press.
It's unlikely the Christian groups would have come up with this idea had not the cartel -- Sony (NYSE: SNE) BMG, EMI, UMG and Warner -- raised it in the first place as part of its effort to kill P2P.
The MPAA is still reporting record profits.
Jon Newton, a TechNewsWorld columnist, founded and runs p2pnet.net, based in Canada, a daily peer-to-peer and digital media news site focused on issues surrounding file sharing, the entertainment industry and distributed computing.
Stocks Plunge on Continued Inflation Worries February 28, 2005
By the closing bell, the Dow was down 75.37, or 0.7 percent, to 10,766.23. The Nasdaq fell 13.68, or 0.66 percent, to 2,051.72, and the S&P 500 had lost 7.77, or 0.64 percent, to close at 1,203.60.
Related Stories
'Betamax Principle' Central to Supreme Court P2P Case January 26, 2005
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) staff attorney Fred von Lohmann noted that the primary issue is the longstanding court stance that technology, even if it is assisting in illegal copying, is not itself a source of liability.
Supreme Court Declines To Hear WorldCom Suit January 10, 2005
"The reason the plaintiffs wanted to be in state court is because the pleading standards are much more lenient from the plaintiff's perspective," Steve Kardell, an attorney at the Dallas law firm of Clouse Dunn Hirsch and an adjunct professor of law at the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, explained.
High Court Rejects Recording Industry's P2P Appeal October 12, 2004
"The Internet in and of itself is based on peer-to-peer technology, and
copyright infringement goes on all day on the Web," said P2P insider Wayne Rosso regarding the Supreme Court appeal. "What should we do -- filter the Internet?"
Beyond File Sharing: P2P Radio Arrives September 18, 2004
Mercora's Atri Chatterjee is confident that P2P radio will avoid legal entanglements with the RIAA because his network will closely regulate the actions of subscribers and will ensure that all required usage fees are paid to the recording industry. "We enable people to webcast music to each other in a P2P-style environment," Chatterjee told TechNewsWorld.
Is a Web Site Sufficient To Establish Jurisdiction? September 16, 2004
It is highly unlikely that a company could be successfully sued in jurisdictions in which its only presence consists of an informational Web site. Second, those online businesses that do actually target customers in a particular jurisdiction are highly vulnerable to lawsuits in such jurisdictions despite the fact they may not have an office and/or employees in such locations.
Related News Alerts
More by Jon Newton
Canadian Music Creators Speak Out Against File Sharing Lawsuits April 26, 2006
"Canadian artists are deeply concerned, not only about autonomy and financial security, but also about creating, preserving and spreading Canada's unique cultural heritage," the Canadian Music Creators Coalition stated. "Laws that help to cede control over the Canadian music industry to foreign labels do not address these concerns."
Big-Four Fight Gaining Ground, Slowly but Surely April 18, 2006
It's a given that the law acts for people with money. Ordinary people have to look after themselves as best they can, something Sony BMG, EMI, Vivendi Universal and Warner Music count on.
Foiled in France: Apple's New Tub of Hot Water March 28, 2006
The French decision must be doubly galling to Steve Jobs because it may also stymie his efforts to introduce a hard-core marketing scheme that he's been highly successful with in the U.S., in France. Under it, Apple gets into major teaching institutions with Apple iPods and iTunes, which are presented as important teaching aids.
Headline Feeds
Talkback: 
